Have you given any thought to perhaps having a supplemental post, which you can use in a similar way to the way FFA use the personal post? Call it say they Thunderdome, and if anons get stuck arguing the equivalent of "No, he's not," "Yes, he is" you can freeze it on the main post, after a few hours or whatever, and tell them to take it to the Thunderdome. That lets the anons in that discussion carry on until their fingers fall off, without it taking over flat view for hours on end. You could even maybe make that unmodded space and just leave them to it. It's just a thought. Thank you for your hard work btw.
Reposting my comment from the main thread: can we please expand the spam rule to limit the # of posts one person can make in a short amount of time? I have no issues with a hands off approach to threads and organization, but posting 100+ comments of nothing but fic titles and summaries in less than an hour is straight up spamming and preventing people from actually using the meme in any meaningful way.
If you're going to go on a heavyhanded screening/deleting spree, could you at least screen/delete entire threads? This thing where people want explanations and you leave up the original comment(s) and delete the explanations, or where people act like butthurt babies and you only delete the people pointing out the butthurt is fucking ridiculous.
Would you consider creating an entirely separate post for Patrick Kane discussion once the current post is done? I know that there's no outright reason to ban him, but I think I and other nonnies would appreciate a space where we don't have to come across him unless we chose to. Or even just a post specifically to do with the rape case and repercussions thereof.
I've noticed a lot of really benign comments have been getting screened lately. As a flat memer, I'd see nothing that violated meme rules but the comment count would go down. Have there been new, unofficial rules added recently that explain the uptick in censorship?
Hi, I just anon-failed at http://dekedangle-rpfanon.dreamwidth.org/4402.html?thread=20871986#cmt20871986. (I have no idea how, or why my username ended up as comment subject, ugh.)
Mods, can you please clarify why comments are being frozen? Are we seriously not allowed to ever mention Kane here? No one was saying anything that violated any of the rules that I can see.
Of course you're allowed to mention Patrick Kane. He is not a banned subject, and there have been other threads involving him that have not been frozen or screened. However, the thread devolved into name calling, and, parenting up, I suspected that there may have been people trying to start wank. Rule #1 is that mods can freeze and screen threads at their discretion. I don't think meme will miss out on all that much in having to quit this argument for a bit.
It seems to me that certain comments on the svmadelyn thread need to be removed. Rather than discussing the topic, people seem to be being nasty about her.
I've always appreciated this meme compared to the other hockey anon meme because the nastiness regarding talking people wasn't allowed. I think its necessary that that continues even if people don't want to agree with what an individual is saying. Thank you for looking in to it.
It's at the point where we can't really discuss anything serious without it being frozen or screened. Endless mean spirited and insulting comments are still allowed.
Suggestion
From: (Anonymous)Call it say they Thunderdome, and if anons get stuck arguing the equivalent of "No, he's not," "Yes, he is" you can freeze it on the main post, after a few hours or whatever, and tell them to take it to the Thunderdome. That lets the anons in that discussion carry on until their fingers fall off, without it taking over flat view for hours on end. You could even maybe make that unmodded space and just leave them to it.
It's just a thought.
Thank you for your hard work btw.
Re: Suggestion
- From:(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-09-10 05:05 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-09-26 12:35 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:Spam Rule
From: (Anonymous)Re: Spam Rule
- From:PKane talk starting up again
From: (Anonymous)(is in comments about Jagr - not sure where you're drawing the line for "all discussion related to")
Re: PKane talk starting up again
- From:Re: PKane talk starting up again
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-10-24 09:44 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: PKane talk starting up again
- From:Re: PKane talk starting up again
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-14 02:27 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: PKane talk starting up again
- From:Re: PKane talk starting up again
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-14 08:39 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-11-08 09:59 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:http://dekedangle-rpfanon.dreamwidth.org/4402.html?thread=20109618#cmt20109618
(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-23 08:46 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:IP Tracking
From: (Anonymous)Re: IP Tracking
- From:Re: IP Tracking
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-11-12 01:35 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: IP Tracking
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-11-25 04:27 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: IP Tracking
- From:Re: IP Tracking
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-11-25 04:42 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: IP Tracking
- From:Sceenings
From: (Anonymous)Re: Sceenings
- From:(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From:Patrick Kane question from main meme
From:Of course you're allowed to mention Patrick Kane. He is not a banned subject, and there have been other threads involving him that have not been frozen or screened. However, the thread devolved into name calling, and, parenting up, I suspected that there may have been people trying to start wank. Rule #1 is that mods can freeze and screen threads at their discretion. I don't think meme will miss out on all that much in having to quit this argument for a bit.
Re: Patrick Kane question from main meme
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-07 03:00 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Patrick Kane question from main meme
- From:Re: Patrick Kane question from main meme
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-07 03:47 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Patrick Kane question from main meme
- From:http://dekedangle-rpfanon.dreamwidth.org/4816.html?view=top-only#comments
(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From:things possibly heading towards wank
From: (Anonymous)Re: things possibly heading towards wank
- From:(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-19 07:02 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-19 07:29 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From:I've always appreciated this meme compared to the other hockey anon meme because the nastiness regarding talking people wasn't allowed. I think its necessary that that continues even if people don't want to agree with what an individual is saying. Thank you for looking in to it.
(no subject)
- From:this may be crossing the line
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-01-10 04:10 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-12-26 06:50 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:Search function?
From: (Anonymous)I was wondering whether this is a paid account and if so whether it's possible for anons to use the search function?
Sorry if the answer to this is obvious elsewhere - Dreamwidth newbie! Thanks.
Re: Search function?
- From:Borderline name calling
From: (Anonymous)Re: Borderline name calling
- From:Name caling
From: (Anonymous)Re: Name caling
- From:Re: Name caling
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-01-12 02:14 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Name caling
- From:Troll in the dungeon
From: (Anonymous)Re: Troll in the dungeon
- From:http://dekedangle-rpfanon.dreamwidth.org/5362.html?thread=23691250#cmt23691250
But FYI, her Twitter is locked, so I think by meme rules that stuff should be screened?
(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-01-22 07:01 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From:(no subject)
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-01-22 02:18 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
- From: